Stream: project-error-handling

Topic: Meeting 2021-07-19


view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 15:54):

I just realized that the cross team collaboration funtimes and the error handling project group meeting are scheduled at the same time

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 15:54):

so I'd like to reschedule our regular meeting to make sure it doesn't collide again in the future

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 15:55):

for now I think we should bump it back by 3 hours, to make room for the CTCFT and social hour. If people can't make that time this week that's fine, we can do this meeting async and figure out a new time that works for everyone in the next two weeks.

view this post on Zulip Charles Ellis O'Riley Jr. (Jul 19 2021 at 15:56):

:call_me:

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 15:57):

so todays meeting is going to be at

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 15:59):

Agenda: https://hackmd.io/@rust-libs/H1-LZXmR_

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 16:19):

Also, this week I've started setting up the libs-team agenda generator to work for the error handling project group

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 16:19):

gonna need some tweeks to get it to work for us properly since we don't have all the triage stuff setup any much/any tagging in our project-error-handling repo but for now it does a good job of pulling in issues from the rust-lang/rust repo

view this post on Zulip Senyo Simpson (Jul 19 2021 at 18:55):

Might miss the meeting (it'll be at 12am my side). From my side: have checked through the PR and looked through comments. @Jane Lusby will send you a message about next steps w.r.t to closing it. In the meantime, going to start fleshing the intro

view this post on Zulip Sean Chen (he/him) (Jul 19 2021 at 20:40):

I'm also not going to be able to make that time. I'm going to be looking through Jane's trial-and-error crate, documenting it and cleaning it up so that I can continue working on the error reporter RFC, using the crate as an example.

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 20:41):

let's just "cancel" the meeting time and do the meeting full async then

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 20:41):

I'll drop my status updates once the social hour is finished

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 21:06):

okay so the error in core work is progressing nicely. I'm nearing completion of the negative trait impl coherence integration work in the compiler

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 21:07):

and we seem to have increased interest on the backtrace work, so hopefully someone will be picking up the design / research work there to help push it over the finish line.

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 21:07):

once those two are done we may be in a position to move Error into core

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 21:08):

the dyno RFC is back in our court so I need to find someone who feels confident writing up that RFC or barring that I will eventually write that RFC myself.

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 21:08):

for now it may end up being a blocker on the backtrace stuff but that is uncertain

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 21:09):

iirc @Jakub Duchniewicz merged the backtrace formatting PR so we might be able to close or fork this issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65280

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 21:10):

since all the important blockers in it should be resolved now afaik

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 21:11):

I've nominated https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79561 for libs API discussion because I expect we will want to just not change that behavior and close the issue

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 21:11):

but I don't think the project group can make that decision itself

view this post on Zulip Nick Cameron (Jul 19 2021 at 23:05):

what sis the "dyno RFC"?

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 23:18):

The Dyno rfc is the subset of the generic member access RFC needed for the type erasure

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 23:18):

Based on nika's Dyno craye

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 23:18):

Crate

view this post on Zulip Jane Lusby (Jul 19 2021 at 23:18):

https://docs.rs/dyno

view this post on Zulip Nick Cameron (Jul 19 2021 at 23:22):

Ah, got it, thanks!

view this post on Zulip Jakub Duchniewicz (Jul 20 2021 at 08:13):

Hi, the time was also slightly too late for me. @Jane Lusby you are right, I closed the backtrace formatting PR, it seems like the issue is resolved now.

view this post on Zulip Jakub Duchniewicz (Jul 20 2021 at 08:14):

As for me, I did not have time to work on the Backtrace in core RFC and I see a BIG interest in this topic so I will be catching up today on your discussions.


Last updated: Jan 26 2022 at 13:21 UTC