Stream: t-release/triage

Topic: Meeting 07.04.2021


view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:00):

@WG-triage meeting time

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:03):

let's get started -

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:05):

so the first thing on the agenda is:
Adding blocked on # to triagebot so that prs are automatically unblocked when a pr or issue is merged

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:07):

i know camelid is probably working on that and i don't any updates on the repo so we can defer it to next time

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:07):

there's a discussion here: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/224082-t-release.2Ftriagebot/topic/implementing.20a.20new.20command

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:08):

the next thing to discuss is - Updates on dashboard

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:09):

looks like there is no change there since our last meeting, so not much to discuss

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:09):

the last thing for the agenda today is - about wip prs

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:10):

i know that as per triage you skip any pr that's marked as "wip" and that's fine but once in a while we need to check on this to check if perhaps some of them are completed, or are abandoned/stale / not updated for a long time and can possibly be closed

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:11):

so if you find that there's not much normal triage to do - you can go through the open wip prs

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:12):

anything that's not updated for more than 3 months should be a good yardstick to ask the author for updates or close them

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:13):

any questions ?

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:14):

i guess not :stuck_out_tongue:

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:15):

the last thing from my side - it would be nice that in reports that you present here - when you put "last updated as n days back" i would suggest instead put the last date since last commit / last review by assigned reviewer, as bstrie suggested the other day

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:16):

that should be it for me

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:16):

@triagebot end-meeting

view this post on Zulip triagebot (Apr 07 2021 at 16:16):

Does anyone have something to bring up?
React with :working_on_it: if you have something to say.
React with :all_good: if you're ready to end the meeting.

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:17):

(at least tick the checkmark :stuck_out_tongue: )

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:18):

then that should be it for today's meeting - thanks for all the work :smile:

view this post on Zulip DPC (Apr 07 2021 at 16:19):

the next meeting will be at , thanks for the work and see you next month :smile:

view this post on Zulip Noah Lev (Apr 08 2021 at 00:33):

DPC said:

the last thing from my side - it would be nice that in reports that you present here - when you put "last updated as n days back" i would suggest instead put the last date since last commit / last review by assigned reviewer, as bstrie suggested the other day

Yeah, that's what I have tended to use as my definition for "last updated".


Last updated: Jan 26 2022 at 13:32 UTC