Stream: t-compiler/wg-prioritization/alerts

Topic: I-prioritize #77094 Cargo freezes at Building stage with ve…


triagebot (Sep 23 2020 at 15:27, on Zulip):

@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #77094 has been requested for prioritization.

Procedure

LeSeulArtichaut (Sep 23 2020 at 15:31, on Zulip):

Seems hard to prioritize without any repro

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 23 2020 at 16:05, on Zulip):

agreed

James Gill (Sep 23 2020 at 16:26, on Zulip):

So at this point all we can do is ask for an msve?

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 23 2020 at 16:31, on Zulip):

@James Gill I think so

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 23 2020 at 16:31, on Zulip):

otherwise we could kind of guess a priority until we see more concrete data and adjust

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 23 2020 at 16:32, on Zulip):

for instance, if someone claims something very bad about their application but we do not have their code I guess I'd just mark it as P-critical anyway and wait or try to discover what could have gone wrong

James Gill (Sep 23 2020 at 16:33, on Zulip):

Thanks for the explanation I asking for more procdure understanding than anything so glad for it, normally would an issue marked in this way just live indefinetely until the owner either closes or provides an msve.

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 23 2020 at 16:33, on Zulip):

Santiago Pastorino said:

for instance, if someone claims something very bad about their application but we do not have their code I guess I'd just mark it as P-critical anyway and wait or try to discover what could have gone wrong

is not something really actionable but I guess it's nice to raise awareness of a potential huge problem we may be having

James Gill (Sep 23 2020 at 16:34, on Zulip):

I also suppose in your example, getting your issue marked as critical is deffo going to give you a nudge to provide an msve (you'd hope atleast)

LeSeulArtichaut (Sep 23 2020 at 18:50, on Zulip):

@James Gill FYI, MCVE means « Minimal Complete and Verifiable Example »

James Gill (Sep 23 2020 at 18:55, on Zulip):

Thanks I read it meant that on the tags list so sorry if I used it in a confusing/dodgy way

James Gill (Sep 23 2020 at 18:55, on Zulip):

Just realised my brain types msve instead of mcve haha

James Gill (Sep 23 2020 at 18:55, on Zulip):

My bad

DPC (Sep 23 2020 at 18:57, on Zulip):

always thought the C was correct, and not sure what V was :grinning:

apiraino (Sep 24 2020 at 12:20, on Zulip):

Santiago Pastorino said:

otherwise we could kind of guess a priority until we see more concrete data and adjust

So this issue can stay unprioritized until we have more info, right?

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 30 2020 at 21:46, on Zulip):

apiraino said:

Santiago Pastorino said:

otherwise we could kind of guess a priority until we see more concrete data and adjust

So this issue can stay unprioritized until we have more info, right?

yes or we can try to guess a priority

apiraino (Oct 01 2020 at 10:58, on Zulip):

We now have repurposed the label S-waiting-on-author and assigned it to this issue

Santiago Pastorino (Oct 07 2020 at 19:14, on Zulip):

I guess after seeing the new messages on this issue I'd categorize this one as P-high or P-critical

Santiago Pastorino (Oct 07 2020 at 19:14, on Zulip):

thoughts?

apiraino (Oct 07 2020 at 19:49, on Zulip):

to be honest I don't think we have enough to really understand (at least I dont). Moreover, the original reporter didnt reply yet

apiraino (Oct 07 2020 at 19:50, on Zulip):

only hint we have is this from simulacrum but not sure it's confirmed by the facts

apiraino (Oct 07 2020 at 19:52, on Zulip):

I mean, we could slap a P-high/I-nominate and move forward, but I would avoid chocking the agenda with unclear issues (as far as possible for us)

Camelid (Oct 07 2020 at 19:54, on Zulip):

simulacrum made a PR (#77634) that they thought would fix #76980 - I believe the pre-release has the fix. Maybe we can get someone who can repro #77094 to try the pre-release?

apiraino (Oct 07 2020 at 20:01, on Zulip):

ah that would be interesting. Perhaps also the other github user invis87 that joined the discussion

Camelid (Oct 07 2020 at 20:02, on Zulip):

I'll post a comment about it

apiraino (Oct 07 2020 at 20:08, on Zulip):

thanks!

Santiago Pastorino (Oct 14 2020 at 19:16, on Zulip):

do we have new info about this one?

apiraino (Oct 14 2020 at 19:26, on Zulip):

none, as far as I know. I was thinking that perhaps in a couple of days we can remove the I-prioritize label temporarily until something happen to help us better understand

apiraino (Oct 14 2020 at 19:27, on Zulip):

By the way is there a policy for issues waiting for a feedback from the reporter for more than X days?

Camelid (Oct 14 2020 at 19:40, on Zulip):

Apply S-waiting-on-author?

triagebot (Oct 19 2020 at 11:57, on Zulip):

Issue #77094's prioritization request has been removed.

LeSeulArtichaut (Oct 19 2020 at 11:58, on Zulip):

Removed prioritization until we have more info

Last update: Apr 10 2021 at 21:30UTC