@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #74539 has been requested for prioritization.
it's caused by #72677 so stable-to-stable regression
the fix is up, r+'d, and nominated for stable & beta backports
the fix lands on master, I still keep this issue open to track backports
so, we could remove
I-prioritize in such a case, or should label
P-medium or so?
I think we can just remove
I-prioritize since the attention will be focused on the PR rather then on the issue itself
i was wondering if we should create a separate issue for the backport and prioritise that instead
Or maybe we could have status labels for issues that can reflect that the issue is waiting for backport
well the thing is prs often mention something as
Issue #74539's prioritization request has been removed.
I-prioritize label, I like LeSeulArtichaut 's idea, it'd be useful to avoid confusion
in general I think if it's not too much of a hassle I'd prioritize even issues that have a pending PR
because that's a nice input when beta/stable nominations are discussed
this nomination is about a
P-low issue or is it about a