@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #79152 has been requested for prioritization.
I-nominated
?Ok it seems this regression is fixed in #74989
I would assign a P-high
as it's breaking working code. I don't see it critical just because the error message seems to indicate that this is intentional. Makes sense? I might be off on this one
Ok it seems this regression is fixed in #74989
the pr is the cause, not the fix
:face_palm: sorry don't know why I wrote the opposite
bump, unprioritized
this looks P-critical
to me, I don't think we should use the Index
impl here but instead keep using builtin indexing
ohh definitely P-critical
Issue #79152's prioritization request has been removed.