@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #80760 has been requested for prioritization.
Seems like P-medium or P-high.
interesting the pr #79812 you linked. is this issue breaking on valid code (I mean the macro)? The error message seems very specific
@WG-prioritization further thoughts on this one? I can't really tell without more investigation
if it's a case of working code -> broken I'd agree with a P-high
Yes, this used to work on 1.50 so it's a very recent regression
Issue #80760's prioritization request has been removed.