@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #81946 has been requested for prioritization.
hmm seems like a regression on unsoundness in a PR aimed to improve ui test performances. The issue was thought to be fixed but it's still reproducible.
FWIW the original issue #69225 was labeled as
P-medium. makes sense to keep the priority consistent?
Yep makes sense :+1:
Issue #81946's prioritization request has been removed.