@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #81289 has been requested for prioritization.
Seems like P-high to me.
this does not seem P-high, the documentation is still correct, just verbose
It also exposes that the function mutates
self internally (thought it shouldn't be possible to observe from the outside), which may confuse people.
I still don't think that makes it P-high, the documentation is not wrong
it's just slightly confusing
Also you've told me in the past that the procedure for rustdoc regressions is use P-high and ping the team :p
P-high so maybe I fix my first
P-high rustdoc issue
Seems good to me.
I still think it's confusing enough (and will occur frequently enough) that it should be
P-high. But, since everyone else seems to think
P-medium, I guess we can do that too :p
P-medium since this has been sitting for a while.
Issue #81289's prioritization request has been removed.