Stream: t-compiler/wg-prioritization/alerts

Topic: I-prioritize #75682 thread 'rustc' panicked


triagebot (Aug 19 2020 at 07:07, on Zulip):

@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #75682 has been requested for prioritization.

Procedure

Santiago Pastorino (Aug 19 2020 at 14:51, on Zulip):

this is the last lacking prioritization

Santiago Pastorino (Aug 19 2020 at 14:51, on Zulip):

I'd say P-medium

Santiago Pastorino (Aug 19 2020 at 14:52, on Zulip):

given that is a stable to stable regression from around 1.40 but the code provided should fail

Santiago Pastorino (Aug 19 2020 at 14:52, on Zulip):

@WG-prioritization/alerts thoughts?

DPC (Aug 19 2020 at 14:52, on Zulip):

p-medium seems good to me

Yuki Okushi (Aug 19 2020 at 14:53, on Zulip):

ditto

lcnr (Aug 19 2020 at 14:56, on Zulip):

why is this expected to fail?

lcnr (Aug 19 2020 at 14:57, on Zulip):

ah, because InterruptSectorManager is not Copy :thinking:

lcnr (Aug 19 2020 at 15:00, on Zulip):

I kink of fear that this is something more serious, as it fails without first emitting an error :thinking:

So I would slightly prefer P-high

Santiago Pastorino (Aug 19 2020 at 15:08, on Zulip):

hmm ok :)

triagebot (Aug 19 2020 at 15:08, on Zulip):

Issue #75682's prioritization request has been removed.

Last update: Apr 16 2021 at 23:15UTC