Stream: t-compiler/wg-prioritization/alerts

Topic: I-prioritize #77849 Getting SIGSEGV with Rust 1.47.0 on mac…


triagebot (Oct 12 2020 at 12:58, on Zulip):

@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #77849 has been requested for prioritization.

Procedure

triagebot (Oct 12 2020 at 12:58, on Zulip):

Issue #77849's prioritization request has been removed.

triagebot (Oct 14 2020 at 14:54, on Zulip):

@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #77849 has been requested for prioritization.

Procedure

lzutao (Oct 14 2020 at 15:00, on Zulip):

the reporter cannot reproduce the issue anymore: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/77849#issuecomment-707163141

apiraino (Oct 14 2020 at 15:26, on Zulip):

right, why do we need to re-prioritize this?

LeSeulArtichaut (Oct 14 2020 at 15:28, on Zulip):

This is a regression and there’s never been any discussion here

LeSeulArtichaut (Oct 14 2020 at 15:28, on Zulip):

Though I have to admit I prioritized it because I thought rustbot somehow skipped it

apiraino (Oct 14 2020 at 15:29, on Zulip):

(deleted)

LeSeulArtichaut (Oct 14 2020 at 15:30, on Zulip):

I’m fine with leaving this unprioritized until we have more information though

apiraino (Oct 14 2020 at 15:31, on Zulip):

makes sense. I'll probably leave a note to the reporter. not sure what we can do at this time. Still, it's linked to #77869 so something interesting might come out

Santiago Pastorino (Oct 14 2020 at 18:44, on Zulip):

lzutao said:

the reporter cannot reproduce the issue anymore: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/77849#issuecomment-707163141

given that this issue is related, or possiby a dupe of #77869, I wonder if #77869 is still possible to duplicate

apiraino (Oct 28 2020 at 11:03, on Zulip):

I will remove the prioritize label favoring to follow the linked issue #77869

triagebot (Oct 28 2020 at 11:03, on Zulip):

Issue #77849's prioritization request has been removed.

Last update: Apr 16 2021 at 22:30UTC