Stream: t-compiler/wg-prioritization/alerts

Topic: #81460 regression 1.51: lifetime may not live long enough


triagebot (Jan 28 2021 at 04:07, on Zulip):

@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #81460 has been requested for prioritization.

Procedure

Camelid (Jan 28 2021 at 04:10, on Zulip):

Seems like P-high.

Camelid (Jan 28 2021 at 04:16, on Zulip):

I suspect #75180 is the cause. If so, we'll need to figure out how to fix this quickly because it adds an insta-stable impl.

Camelid (Jan 28 2021 at 04:17, on Zulip):

Likely we'll have to revert it until we figure out what to do.

Camelid (Jan 28 2021 at 04:21, on Zulip):

Hmm, that PR said the breakage was considered acceptable...

apiraino (Jan 28 2021 at 09:56, on Zulip):

I don't have the context to judge this so I second your estimate (breaking changes not good)

apiraino (Jan 28 2021 at 09:57, on Zulip):

Camelid said:

Hmm, that PR said the breakage was considered acceptable...

... but on the other hand you point out this , so maybe let's wait for some feedback from the PR authors you ping in the issue? I mean, if se set it high now, the compiler team would need anyway a feedback from PR authors, right?

apiraino (Jan 28 2021 at 09:58, on Zulip):

maybe I-nominate?

apiraino (Jan 28 2021 at 11:46, on Zulip):

I will tentatively assign P-high

Camelid (Jan 28 2021 at 21:01, on Zulip):

I think this is probably worth nominating in addition.

Jonas Schievink (Jan 28 2021 at 21:15, on Zulip):

does T-libs go through nominated issues nowadays?

Léo Lanteri Thauvin (Jan 28 2021 at 21:18, on Zulip):

They do IIRC

Camelid (Jan 28 2021 at 22:26, on Zulip):

(I nominated btw)

Camelid (Jan 28 2021 at 22:27, on Zulip):

Ha, get it? "I nominated" :big_smile:

Last update: Apr 11 2021 at 18:00UTC