Stream: t-compiler/wg-prioritization/alerts

Topic: I-prioritize #76733 Can't cross-build rustc for aarch64-app…


triagebot (Sep 15 2020 at 04:34, on Zulip):

@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #76733 has been requested for prioritization.

Procedure

apiraino (Sep 15 2020 at 09:09, on Zulip):

This could be not high priority per se (it's a regression on Tier 3 platform, not yet on "Support" level) but seems to involve building rustc itself on that platform, so maybe not too difficult to fix as well? I'd say P-high to have someone have a look at that and perhaps have a more informed opinion.

By the way, there's a tracking issue for the new ARM64 Apple platform.

Joshua Nelson (Sep 15 2020 at 12:16, on Zulip):

I think we should just ping simulacrum on the issue and he'll know what priority it should have

Joshua Nelson (Sep 15 2020 at 12:17, on Zulip):

Done

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 16 2020 at 18:15, on Zulip):

this is pending prioritization but I've seen that you were going to ping @simulacrum about it

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 16 2020 at 18:15, on Zulip):

well it has a PR up

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 16 2020 at 18:16, on Zulip):

I don't think this matters then

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 16 2020 at 18:16, on Zulip):

I meant, if this were looking like a P-critical it would matter to priorize regardless having a PR up

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 16 2020 at 18:16, on Zulip):

but doesn't seem the case

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 16 2020 at 18:17, on Zulip):

anyway if we quickly agree on a priority we could set it

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 16 2020 at 18:19, on Zulip):

well this looks more like T-infra than T-compiler :)

Joshua Nelson (Sep 16 2020 at 18:19, on Zulip):

P-high maybe, but agreed this is a T-infra issue

apiraino (Sep 16 2020 at 18:19, on Zulip):

Santiago Pastorino said:

I meant, if this were looking like a P-critical it would matter to priorize regardless having a PR up

yeah, the fix is coming right away, probably prioritizing now doesn't add anything

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 16 2020 at 18:20, on Zulip):

delegated to infra

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 16 2020 at 18:21, on Zulip):

apiraino said:

Santiago Pastorino said:

I meant, if this were looking like a P-critical it would matter to priorize regardless having a PR up

yeah, the fix is coming right away, probably prioritizing now doesn't add anything

if we were talking in general, it's important to add a priority regardless of it having a PR. Think that the PR may be discussed, people may disagree and it may take time, meanwhile if the issue is P-critical nobody will know that and it may miss a release

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 16 2020 at 18:21, on Zulip):

also we bump the homu priority for PR's that fix high priority issues

DPC (Oct 26 2020 at 18:46, on Zulip):

infra issues can be nominated directly iirc

Last update: Apr 10 2021 at 21:00UTC