@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #76452 has been requested for prioritization.
(this is solved btw but was wondering if there is anything documented regarding ulimit or if we could do anything about this in general)
I mean, 'use less threads'? that kills compile times though :/
I don't know if it's worth fixing
it would be nice to give a better error message though
so I'd say P-medium WRT the error message and P-low WRT to making it actually work with ulimit=100
especially since you can work around it with
I agree on
P-medium, a crash is a always crash.
Are there real world situations in which limiting to
100 the max user processes is useful? In case we can always raise the bumb the flag a bit higher
I was more inclined to go with
P-low but I'm fine with
P-medium that is what you've agreed on, so :+1:
Issue #76452's prioritization request has been removed.