Stream: t-compiler/wg-prioritization/alerts

Topic: I-prioritize #76496 Reproducibility regression caused by 57…


triagebot (Sep 09 2020 at 00:48, on Zulip):

@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #76496 has been requested for prioritization.

Procedure

apiraino (Sep 09 2020 at 08:34, on Zulip):

I can't figure out the context but a regression on a nightly smells like at least P-high. Can I add the mvce label? Would that help framing the issue?

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 09 2020 at 19:47, on Zulip):

this one has a PR already r+ed so it doesn't matter anymore :)

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 09 2020 at 19:47, on Zulip):

I was wondering, can that kind of things be tested?

apiraino (Sep 09 2020 at 19:51, on Zulip):

not sure, In this very specific case

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 09 2020 at 20:17, on Zulip):

cc @oli (given you approved it), I wonder if this is testeable, my guess is no because you didn't ask for that but wanted to learn a bit more about that :)

apiraino (Sep 14 2020 at 20:48, on Zulip):

@Santiago Pastorino this was closed, can the I-prioritize be removed, right?

Joshua Nelson (Sep 14 2020 at 20:50, on Zulip):

I wonder if this is testable

The test is "stage3 is the same as stage2"

Joshua Nelson (Sep 14 2020 at 20:50, on Zulip):

Which is expensive to run on CI and there are community members running it anyway (as seen from the issue), so bors doesn't test it currently

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 14 2020 at 20:58, on Zulip):

@Joshua Nelson makes sense

Santiago Pastorino (Sep 14 2020 at 20:59, on Zulip):

apiraino said:

Santiago Pastorino this was closed, can the I-prioritize be removed, right?

yes, I think triage wg does that?

apiraino (Sep 14 2020 at 21:05, on Zulip):

/shrugs

apiraino (Sep 14 2020 at 21:05, on Zulip):

can we?
EDIT: answered in other thread

Last update: Apr 10 2021 at 22:30UTC