@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #81555 has been requested for prioritization.
Might be biased, but looks like a
P-critical to me.
This uses nightly features though?
Since it's nightly-only and (so far) can only be repro'd with proc macros, I think this should be somewhere between P-medium <-> P-high.
Issue #81555's prioritization request has been removed.
FWIW, this is not a regression since it's nightly-only
It used to work on old nightlies (and stable with
RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1). It's indeed not a
regression-from-stable-to-nightly, though. I really wanted to call it
P-High seems a little high to me
That code didn't work properly before (hygiene information was lost)
and the correslinding feature still needs work, especially around parsing priorities
If it's nightly-only I'd say just remove the priority
P-medium as a "compromise"?
Ahh... I went off the label w/o verifying, my bad. :(
That's okay :)
I think it would be good to get this prioritized since we have 11 issues to get through :)