Stream: t-compiler/wg-prioritization/alerts

Topic: #81555 ICE (Missing tokens for nt) on nightly with `stmt_ex…


triagebot (Jan 30 2021 at 14:55, on Zulip):

@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #81555 has been requested for prioritization.

Procedure

Hameer Abbasi (Jan 30 2021 at 19:58, on Zulip):

Might be biased, but looks like a P-critical to me.

Léo Lanteri Thauvin (Jan 30 2021 at 19:59, on Zulip):

This uses nightly features though?

Camelid (Jan 30 2021 at 20:38, on Zulip):

Since it's nightly-only and (so far) can only be repro'd with proc macros, I think this should be somewhere between P-medium <-> P-high.

Camelid (Feb 01 2021 at 04:00, on Zulip):

bump

triagebot (Feb 01 2021 at 12:36, on Zulip):

Issue #81555's prioritization request has been removed.

Léo Lanteri Thauvin (Feb 01 2021 at 12:43, on Zulip):

FWIW, this is not a regression since it's nightly-only

hyd-dev (Feb 01 2021 at 13:06, on Zulip):

It used to work on old nightlies (and stable with RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1). It's indeed not a regression-from-stable-to-nightly, though. I really wanted to call it regression-from-nightly-to-nightly...

Aaron Hill (Feb 01 2021 at 14:33, on Zulip):

P-High seems a little high to me

Aaron Hill (Feb 01 2021 at 14:33, on Zulip):

That code didn't work properly before (hygiene information was lost)

Aaron Hill (Feb 01 2021 at 14:34, on Zulip):

and the correslinding feature still needs work, especially around parsing priorities

Léo Lanteri Thauvin (Feb 01 2021 at 14:39, on Zulip):

If it's nightly-only I'd say just remove the priority

Camelid (Feb 01 2021 at 21:18, on Zulip):

How about P-medium as a "compromise"?

Hameer Abbasi (Feb 03 2021 at 10:44, on Zulip):

Ahh... I went off the label w/o verifying, my bad. :(

Camelid (Feb 03 2021 at 16:29, on Zulip):

That's okay :)

Camelid (Feb 03 2021 at 16:29, on Zulip):

I think it would be good to get this prioritized since we have 11 issues to get through :)

Camelid (Feb 03 2021 at 16:29, on Zulip):

So P-medium?

Last update: Apr 15 2021 at 02:45UTC