@WG-prioritization/alerts issue #80059 has been requested for prioritization.
Probably P-low as it's sound as-is, and has been this way for over 3 years.
I think either
P-medium are fine here
P-medium seems better to me, since
P-low is often "won't fix".
P-medium seems good
Issue #80059's prioritization request has been removed.
@Léo Lanteri Thauvin 3 days ago you tried to remove the
I-nominated label but still has that label - should that label be removed?
I was wondering if it was nominated for
I don't have the answer, but I think we should skip it in the agenda
(i.e. not include it)
Ultimately this needs a
T-lang decision (see rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#261)
ok, will remove it. I was wondering how that label was still there after a deliberate action to remove it :thinking:
ok, will remove it
From the agenda? Or remove the label from the issue?
label from issue
do the t-lang pick that label somehow? (sorry always asking the same questions...)
I think it should stay there for
I'm pretty sure they do
ok, then I'd apply the
I-nominated back (fix my mistake) but then ... maybe remove
T-compilerso it doesnt appear in our agenda?
Seems fine to me, with a comment explaining that I guess
I can do it if you want
ok, left a brief note (hope it's fine). Just a small detail so when tomorrow we refresh the agenda this issue doesnt show up