@WG-prioritization issue #71297 has been requested for prioritization.
This only happens in a "failing path", so according to our (new!) priority definitions, this should be
P-low. However this is a regression, should we bump it to
It won't get into beta anyway I think
This will reach stable on Tuesday, so it's probably not getting a fix before that. However, or-patterns are still unstable anyways, so it's unlikely that a user will try to write code like this on stable (the bug was found via fuzzing).
p-low makes sense to me
Issue #71297's prioritization request has been removed.