Stream: t-compiler/wg-prioritization

Topic: I-prioritize #71695 Dynamically select alignment of a `dyn T


triagebot (Apr 29 2020 at 21:14, on Zulip):

@WG-prioritization issue #71695 has been requested for prioritization.

triagebot (Apr 29 2020 at 21:14, on Zulip):

@WG-prioritization issue #71695 has been requested for prioritization.

Santiago Pastorino (Apr 30 2020 at 13:21, on Zulip):

@pnkfelix has spawned #71416 into #71695 (the issue we need to prioritize) and #71694 (which was prioritized by @pnkfelix as P-high)

Santiago Pastorino (Apr 30 2020 at 13:22, on Zulip):

I agree that #71694 is P-high because it represents the most urgent part of #71416

pnkfelix (Apr 30 2020 at 13:22, on Zulip):

yeah; essentially the question is "how important is completing this part of the feature"

Santiago Pastorino (Apr 30 2020 at 13:22, on Zulip):

so let's prioritize #71695

pnkfelix (Apr 30 2020 at 13:22, on Zulip):

My instinct is to say "this is not that important"

Santiago Pastorino (Apr 30 2020 at 13:22, on Zulip):

I'd say this is P-medium

pnkfelix (Apr 30 2020 at 13:23, on Zulip):

yeah, that is probably a reasonable prioritization

pnkfelix (Apr 30 2020 at 13:23, on Zulip):

I will admit that I'm not familiar with what kinds of code want this feature

Santiago Pastorino (Apr 30 2020 at 13:23, on Zulip):

I'm not sure if there's a more general dynamic allocation tracking issue or something like that

pnkfelix (Apr 30 2020 at 13:23, on Zulip):

but there are other features in the pipeline that I suspect are far higher priority

pnkfelix (Apr 30 2020 at 13:23, on Zulip):

That's a good question

Santiago Pastorino (Apr 30 2020 at 13:24, on Zulip):

I remember seeing something but unsure if an issue, a post on IRLO, discussions here, hehe, can't remember

triagebot (Apr 30 2020 at 13:26, on Zulip):

Issue #71695's prioritization request has been removed.

Last update: Jun 05 2020 at 22:25UTC