@WG-prioritization issue #72115 has been requested for prioritization.
P-medium I'd say:
Error message emitted before ICE is accurate
uff, didn't see that :sweat_smile: I still think it should be
P-high. While this is does not cause UB directly, it seems to have evaded at least one internal safety check which kind of makes me worried.
If it happens in a failing path, according to our definitions for the priority levels, this should be
I'm fine with
While this is does not cause UB directly, it seems to have evaded at least one internal safety check which kind of makes me worried.
Given this is an ICE issue I don't think we should be worried by soundness issues
Wesley Wiser said:
- Not a stable-to-beta or stable-to-nightly regression
- Error message emitted before ICE is accurate
- No safety implications
- Code is "obviously" wrong
My first reaction was also
I wonder if something that ICEs should ever be
yeh P-low is okay
Issue #72115's prioritization request has been removed.