Stream: t-release/triagebot

Topic: Triagebot documentation


XAMPPRocky (May 22 2020 at 17:56, on Zulip):

@simulacrum What would think about moving/copying the documentation for triagebot from the wiki to forge? Obviously it loses the tight coupling and could take a bit longer to be up to date, but I think it would make the documentation easier to find for users.

simulacrum (May 22 2020 at 17:57, on Zulip):

seems fine to me, though we'll probably want to leave a link to forge

simulacrum (May 22 2020 at 17:57, on Zulip):

I mostly didn't really want to spend the time getting forge working and such when I started the wiki

apiraino (Jun 23 2020 at 13:29, on Zulip):

I was about to draft some documentation about the triagebot, but luckily I was pointed to this stream.

Where can I find the Triagebot documentation ? thx

mentions (just in case) @XAMPPRocky @simulacrum

LeSeulArtichaut (Jun 23 2020 at 13:30, on Zulip):

You'll find it in the Wiki of the triagebot repo

LeSeulArtichaut (Jun 23 2020 at 13:30, on Zulip):

See https://github.com/rust-lang/triagebot/wiki

apiraino (Jun 23 2020 at 13:31, on Zulip):

ah right the main repo! I was on a fork and there was no wiki :upside_down:

thanks!

LeSeulArtichaut (Jun 23 2020 at 13:31, on Zulip):

You're welcome :slight_smile:

LeSeulArtichaut (Jun 23 2020 at 13:32, on Zulip):

What are you searching for btw? The documentation about "requesting prioritization" is probably outdated

apiraino (Jun 23 2020 at 13:35, on Zulip):

the "backstory" for my question was that in this todo list for the wg-prio
https://hackmd.io/P3yvagSSS7yAI2QxhLfPtQ#Tasks

there are some tasks about offloading some tasks to the triagebot instead of (this was my understanding) generating some markdown "by hand", (example " Implement @triagebot commands for each step of our procedure" and following).

So I thought about first starting to gather a bit of docs to 1) understand how that work and 2) if there's something I can help with

apiraino (Jun 23 2020 at 13:36, on Zulip):

I'm catching up with all the past discussions, so I'm rebuilding the history little by little :)

LeSeulArtichaut (Jun 23 2020 at 13:38, on Zulip):

I've implemented a few things in Triagebot for the WG, so feel free to ping me if you think I might be able to answer it, otherwise forward it to simulacrum

XAMPPRocky (Jun 23 2020 at 14:14, on Zulip):

@apiraino I've been meaning to move all the triagebot documentation from forge if you'd like I'd accept a PR that moves everything to forge. I think the most appropriate place would be under "chat platforms".

XAMPPRocky (Jun 23 2020 at 14:15, on Zulip):

I've also been meaning to rename that to platforms to have single category that encapsulates all the different platforms we use.

apiraino (Jun 23 2020 at 14:33, on Zulip):

ah that would be a "good first issue" :-) I'll have a look at that!

apiraino (Jun 27 2020 at 19:57, on Zulip):

@XAMPPRocky sorry for this basic question, I don't understand what this comment requires to do, it has to do with me not being familiar with mdbook:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-forge/pull/388#discussion_r446092540

All the subchapters under "Chat platforms" point to the directory /chat/. Renaming the chapter to "Platforms" should not change this fact, If am I correct.

apiraino (Jun 27 2020 at 19:58, on Zulip):

I could not find out elsewhere in ./booklinks that seems to need a redirect, so Im wondering which links should I map :thinking:

XAMPPRocky (Jun 27 2020 at 20:00, on Zulip):

@apiraino Well I feel that we should also move the source files to match the layout so that the structure in the repo matches the website.

XAMPPRocky (Jun 27 2020 at 20:01, on Zulip):

E.g. I think it shouldn't be /chat/ but /platforms/.

apiraino (Jun 27 2020 at 20:01, on Zulip):

oh right, now I understand (and of course it makes sense). Renaming the whole subdir to ./chat > ./platforms and then maps the redirects

apiraino (Jun 27 2020 at 20:02, on Zulip):

ok now I get it, otherwise we all the people visiting old "chat/*" links would get a 404

XAMPPRocky (Jun 27 2020 at 20:06, on Zulip):

Yep exactly.

XAMPPRocky (Jun 27 2020 at 20:40, on Zulip):

@apiraino If it isn’t too much hassle once you’re done with the feedback would you be able to squash the changes into a smaller set of commits? Should hopefully make it easier to review. I was thinking one for the move to platforms and then one for adding the bot docs but feel free to choose what you think is best.

apiraino (Jun 27 2020 at 21:12, on Zulip):

squash the changes into a smaller set of commits

absolutely, that was already in my plans for that PR (I usually rebase messy PRs into a new PR). There are a couple more things I want to check before raising the hand and ask for more feedback. When the content will be finalized, I'd rebase into a new PR with clean commits

Last update: Sep 22 2020 at 02:00UTC