@Kyle Strand I answered your question re: unspecified behavior here
@nikomatsakis I'm sorry, I never got around to revisiting the scope discussion in the RFC PR, and now it's about to be merged. Should we stop the merge to revisit the scope verbiage, even though it wasn't formally cited as a blocking concern, or is it okay that the feedbacks in the PR thread didn't really make it in to the RFC text?
I think we can just merge the text in
probably a good idea to do so
Oh, I didn't realize RFC merges are manual; when I sent that message I thought we would be racing against the clock if we wanted to make changes.
I don't think we have verbiage ready-to-go, though, do we?
I forget how "ready to go" my wording was
Let me see how today goes at work; I am hoping to have more time to engage with this project again soon.