Hello all, I had previously written up a document about a new RFC discussion model and I felt that it related a lot of the topics that people brought up about the current process in the initial meeting. I would love to know what people think of it.
I'll take a look later today @XAMPPRocky and try to give more detailed feedback this time
This is a great idea for an interaction model. It naturally separates the discussion into threads for specific aspects of the design. I'll help build it.
I like the idea of changing the basic structure from "statement" into "question"
I'm not sure if this is the right thing for all phases of the workflow
But I think it could well make sense in some cases
I am somewhat wary of building tooling before the "social" model, though
Yeah, I agree that we shouldn't building any tooling yet. I think if we want to effectively change the RFC process we need to completely sure about how we model the discussion before we can implement it.