Stream: t-lang/wg-meta

Topic: rfc discussion model

XAMPPRocky (May 03 2019 at 05:50, on Zulip):

Hello all, I had previously written up a document about a new RFC discussion model and I felt that it related a lot of the topics that people brought up about the current process in the initial meeting. I would love to know what people think of it.

nikomatsakis (May 03 2019 at 09:44, on Zulip):

I'll take a look later today @XAMPPRocky and try to give more detailed feedback this time

Elahn Ientile (May 04 2019 at 00:32, on Zulip):

This is a great idea for an interaction model. It naturally separates the discussion into threads for specific aspects of the design. I'll help build it.

nikomatsakis (May 07 2019 at 17:52, on Zulip):

I like the idea of changing the basic structure from "statement" into "question"

nikomatsakis (May 07 2019 at 17:52, on Zulip):

I'm not sure if this is the right thing for all phases of the workflow

nikomatsakis (May 07 2019 at 17:52, on Zulip):

But I think it could well make sense in some cases

nikomatsakis (May 07 2019 at 17:53, on Zulip):

I am somewhat wary of building tooling before the "social" model, though

XAMPPRocky (May 08 2019 at 05:57, on Zulip):

Yeah, I agree that we shouldn't building any tooling yet. I think if we want to effectively change the RFC process we need to completely sure about how we model the discussion before we can implement it.

Last update: Jul 14 2020 at 13:20UTC