Stream: t-compiler/wg-parallel-rustc

Topic: will we meet today?


nikomatsakis (Nov 04 2019 at 19:04, on Zulip):

I think I would rather not meet today, though I have no objection to y'all meeting -- I've just got some catch-up work to do

nikomatsakis (Nov 04 2019 at 19:04, on Zulip):

Well, let me phrase that a bit more open-ended

nikomatsakis (Nov 04 2019 at 19:04, on Zulip):

Will we meet today? Do we have things to discuss?

nikomatsakis (Nov 04 2019 at 19:04, on Zulip):

(cc @WG-parallel-rustc)

simulacrum (Nov 04 2019 at 19:05, on Zulip):

I think if we did it would be to go over the doc that @Alex Crichton prepared

simulacrum (Nov 04 2019 at 19:05, on Zulip):

I don't think that needs to be done synchronously though

Santiago Pastorino (Nov 04 2019 at 19:06, on Zulip):

on my part I went over CrateMetadata fields, @Vadim Petrochenkov also did some work

Santiago Pastorino (Nov 04 2019 at 19:06, on Zulip):

unsure if someone saw all that and have thoughts

simulacrum (Nov 04 2019 at 19:06, on Zulip):

https://hackmd.io/oUdvUU2lTk2ZxfOWQBT9xQ?both is that doc

simulacrum (Nov 04 2019 at 19:07, on Zulip):

I don't think I have any sync-needing thoughts though, so I'm fine skipping a week

Paul Faria (Nov 04 2019 at 19:07, on Zulip):

I only have to get another review from @oli on my PR (extracting interior mutability from Body.cache)

simulacrum (Nov 04 2019 at 19:07, on Zulip):

I've been working on some of the Session stuff, putting up (smallish) PRs as I go

simulacrum (Nov 04 2019 at 19:08, on Zulip):

but again don't feel that we need a meeting for that to unblock me

Alex Crichton (Nov 04 2019 at 19:08, on Zulip):

I don't mind going either way

simulacrum (Nov 04 2019 at 19:09, on Zulip):

sounds like we don't have any particular need for a sync meeting, so I think let's cancel

simulacrum (Nov 11 2019 at 13:48, on Zulip):

@nikomatsakis Are we meeting today? I don't have anything in particular for agenda, I think...

My work on Session has mostly stalled out -- everything left is mostly either fine or just a pre-TyCtxt query (Once), which is also fine

Santiago Pastorino (Nov 11 2019 at 13:51, on Zulip):

I was wondering the same if we are having the meeting today

Santiago Pastorino (Nov 11 2019 at 13:52, on Zulip):

also @simulacrum If I can be of help on something let me know

Alex Crichton (Nov 11 2019 at 14:14, on Zulip):

I unfortunately won't be able to make it if we meet

nikomatsakis (Nov 11 2019 at 15:21, on Zulip):

I am happy to skip this week. It seems like we're approaching a point where the "shared state fears" are pretty minimal

nikomatsakis (Nov 11 2019 at 15:21, on Zulip):

And it's mostly a perf question at this point?

simulacrum (Nov 11 2019 at 16:18, on Zulip):

Indeed, that's my impression -- let's skip then, I don't think a sync meeting is super helpful since we have nothing in particular to discuss

simulacrum (Nov 11 2019 at 16:19, on Zulip):

We probably should figure out a next step for perf work -- I'm unclear if we have any known culprits at this point

Alex Crichton (Nov 11 2019 at 17:02, on Zulip):

I'm under the impression at least that the main culprit is the investigation I did a week or so ago?

Alex Crichton (Nov 11 2019 at 17:03, on Zulip):

the doc about spinning up threads and all time going into the system?

Alex Crichton (Nov 11 2019 at 17:03, on Zulip):

basically the summary at the top of https://hackmd.io/oUdvUU2lTk2ZxfOWQBT9xQ?view#Alex-Profiles-Cargo-and--j28

simulacrum (Nov 11 2019 at 18:30, on Zulip):

hm, I seemed to recall the conclusion from that was "this is not great, but not a major contributor"

simulacrum (Nov 11 2019 at 18:30, on Zulip):

and in any case that we're still not seeing amazing gains that we were hoping for on the single-crate case, where it matters a little more in some sense

Last update: Nov 17 2019 at 08:00UTC