I foresee a lot of "let's do this discussion
async" and "we are
awaiting a reply from <so-and-so>" puns in this stream.
You're seeing the Future?
@Taylor Cramer another case of "some temporaries show up in generators that maybe shouldn't" is #57478 -- it was initially from an
async fn urlo post (repro with
async fn on the playground), so maybe it's already tracked by this WG ?
@lqd yeah,looks similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59087, i'll link the two
What's the best task for me to take given that #53249 ended up being a no-op?
@nikomatsakis I messaged @boats asking for their opinion on whether or not I should open the
await-syntax PR. I want to make sure it doesn't seem like I'm trying to angle for a particular solution by way of landing an implementation. If it's okay with @boats and everyone else on lang, I'll go ahead and open the PR.
I figured I'd try and do a quick check-in WRT syntax at the meeting on thursday
I've been bothering @centril to write up their thoughts-- I'd like to try and figure out how to make progress soon, as I think we're very near being ready WRT the implementation. The only thing still left is the multiple lifetimes issue, which I plan to work on tomorrow and friday (thanks again for your notes on that btw).