Stream: wg-async-foundations

Topic: general

Jake Goulding (Feb 26 2019 at 21:51, on Zulip):

I foresee a lot of "let's do this discussion async" and "we are awaiting a reply from <so-and-so>" puns in this stream.

Giles Cope (Mar 03 2019 at 05:43, on Zulip):

You're seeing the Future?

lqd (Mar 19 2019 at 18:04, on Zulip):

@Taylor Cramer another case of "some temporaries show up in generators that maybe shouldn't" is #57478 -- it was initially from an async fn urlo post (repro with async fn on the playground), so maybe it's already tracked by this WG ?

Taylor Cramer (Mar 19 2019 at 18:27, on Zulip):

@lqd yeah,looks similar to, i'll link the two

davidtwco (Apr 24 2019 at 18:51, on Zulip):

What's the best task for me to take given that #53249 ended up being a no-op?

Taylor Cramer (Apr 24 2019 at 23:30, on Zulip):

@nikomatsakis I messaged @boats asking for their opinion on whether or not I should open the await-syntax PR. I want to make sure it doesn't seem like I'm trying to angle for a particular solution by way of landing an implementation. If it's okay with @boats and everyone else on lang, I'll go ahead and open the PR.

Taylor Cramer (Apr 24 2019 at 23:31, on Zulip):

I figured I'd try and do a quick check-in WRT syntax at the meeting on thursday

Taylor Cramer (Apr 24 2019 at 23:33, on Zulip):

I've been bothering @centril to write up their thoughts-- I'd like to try and figure out how to make progress soon, as I think we're very near being ready WRT the implementation. The only thing still left is the multiple lifetimes issue, which I plan to work on tomorrow and friday (thanks again for your notes on that btw).

Last update: Jul 16 2020 at 15:15UTC