I've noticed that some group names in Zulip are
wg-compiler-* and some are just
wg-* - do we want to standardise this?
which ones are wg-compiler-*?
all of them seem wg-topic to me.
NLL, traits and meta
that appears as
oh group names
I mean the user groups - the aliases - not the streams.
my vote is for us to standardize on wg-topic
One other thing: There are some working groups (e.g., traits, async-await) that kind of "bridge" compiler and lang
and I would expect this to be more and more common
I don't really know the right way to deal with that :) there are (within said groups) distinct concerns, to be sure
maybe the idea of t-compiler/wg-foo is ungreat, we should just do a "flatter" structure
I sort of "secretly" hope to move more t-lang stuff to Zulip, as well.