MaybeUninit docs warn about validity vs safety (without using that terminology), but
assume_init only links to that. Do you think it is worth repeating that warning? https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63298
Yes, redundancy is a good thing :slight_smile:
@centril see mark's comment there. are we okay saying what we are saying about
Let me double check
@RalfJ tho what does 1-initialized
Vec<T> mean in terms of code?
I reviewed too hastily it seems :D
RalfJ tho what does 1-initialized
Vec<T>mean in terms of code?
0xFFu8 is better
I pushed the other edit we talked about