@eddyb do you want me to address your comments about the functions that need
#[allow(improper_ctypes)] in this PR or should we open an issue for these to be resolved as a follow-up?
@eddyb (another ping, my previous ping was in an edit due to typo, so you wouldn't have been notified)
I think I'll try the proc-macro changes myself, if I don't forget
@davidtwco I can clean up a bit of it now that #53451 is gone :D
Is there anything else you want changed in #65134?
@davidtwco idk I don't think I want to land the
proc_macro, but it also depends how quickly my PR gets reviewed
I don't have a strong preference, I guess. I left a couple more comments on your PR and that's it I think
@eddyb I've addressed your comments.
I don't feel strongly about the