hey @T-compiler -- the bors queue is almost empty... y'all need to r+ some more :P
Haven't had that problem in a while
its what you get when you don't have 259 problems and the power of rollups
@centril You can review https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59517 =P
@Zoxc I can rubber stamp, I cannot review ;)
That doesn't sound right. Everyone can review, only the compiler team can rubber stamp? =P
+1,274 −2,316 :thinking:
@Zoxc @oli can review your PR tho ;)
I still have 90 new notifications since yesterday, I may not get to reviews until tomorrow or tuesday
I am pleased to say that the queue is entirely empty now and has been for hours.
all that wasted money :(
Yeah; start r+ing folks
@Pietro Albini perhaps this is a good time to rustfmt?
perhaps revive #58702 first :upside_down:
@kennytm waiting on boostrap changes
perhaps this is a good time to rustfmt?
By the way, the primary issue with trailing expressions that I was complaining about in https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/running-rustfmt-on-rust-lang-rust-and-other-rust-lang-repositories/8732/72 is fixed now (only in rustfmt 2.0 mode though).
(I still think this formatting thing needs a test run on a single crate though, to get experience with the process.)
only in rustfmt 2.0 mode
TIL — what is this?
version = "Two" in rustfmt.toml
rustfmt attempts to avoid changing formatting in stable releases
Hm. It's not obviously documented on the README; is there somewhere more official I should be reading to learn about what settings that implies?
It's mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/blob/master/Configurations.md
Ugh. That should probably be exposed in the playground in some manner...