Stream: t-compiler

Topic: RLS and roadmap


nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:12, on Zulip):

Hey @Igor Matuszewski (actually cc @matklad too, if you're around) -- as you may have seen, I've been working on finishing up a draft of 2019 Roadmap. One thing I was thinking about as part of that is that this is a great opportunity to try and broadcast our plans re: the RLS and RLS 2.0

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:12, on Zulip):

Also, I think there was (from the Tools IDE team?) a kind of "IDE Roadmap" document, right?

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:12, on Zulip):

(Which I think covered also IntelliJ, for example)

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:13, on Zulip):

Ah, I see @Igor Matuszewski you mentioned it already in #t-compiler/wg-rls-2.0

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:13, on Zulip):

This is the paper document

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:14, on Zulip):

Did you wind up posting that somewhere?

Igor Matuszewski (Mar 04 2019 at 21:14, on Zulip):

Yup, we have that

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:14, on Zulip):

I'm trying to think how to surface some of that into the Rust Roadmap itself

Igor Matuszewski (Mar 04 2019 at 21:14, on Zulip):

this got merged into dev tools team orga cc @Manish Goregaokar

Igor Matuszewski (Mar 04 2019 at 21:14, on Zulip):

not sure if we want to wait and collect all the appropriate tool/subteam roadmaps and publish one collectively

Igor Matuszewski (Mar 04 2019 at 21:14, on Zulip):

also cc @Pascal

Igor Matuszewski (Mar 04 2019 at 21:15, on Zulip):

I know we wanted to start coming up and writing those roadmaps down but as I said, unsure if we'll want to do that separately or not

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:16, on Zulip):

I see, ok

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:16, on Zulip):

well, let me read it first of all in more depth :)

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:16, on Zulip):

and try to think what I think it means for larger Rust roadmap

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:17, on Zulip):

If nothing else, if that roadmap is published somewhere "public", I can include links to it

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:28, on Zulip):

Re-reading the Roadmap, I don't quite see where to fit a detailed discussion of our plans

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:29, on Zulip):

I think what needs to happen is that the compiler team needs to trumpet our plans regarding the RLS, RLS 2.0, etc

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:29, on Zulip):

and then we need to link to those from the roadmap

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:30, on Zulip):

As I said, to some extent this existing IDE announcement already is that

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:30, on Zulip):

so for now that's probably enough

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 21:40, on Zulip):

However, I don't find a public link to that document .. unless I'm missing something. e.g., the stuff that @Manish Goregaokar wrote in this All Hands recap is different

nikomatsakis (Mar 04 2019 at 23:42, on Zulip):

OK, @Igor Matuszewski, @matklad I took a stab at mentioning RLS 2.0 -- big thanks to @Aaron Turon for helping me to frame it =). I didn't wind up mentioning rust-analyzer by name, because it didn't feel necessary to the "big picture", but tell me what you think.

Manish Goregaokar (Mar 05 2019 at 01:34, on Zulip):

https://github.com/rust-dev-tools/dev-tools-team/blob/master/roadmaps/ides-and-editors-2019.md

matklad (Mar 05 2019 at 05:28, on Zulip):

LGTM(like, this is the perfect summary :) ), “rust-analyzer” name is totally an implementation detail, no need to mention it.

Igor Matuszewski (Mar 05 2019 at 10:53, on Zulip):

@nikomatsakis sounds great, thanks!

Last update: Nov 20 2019 at 02:00UTC