I wrote some notes on this ticket. There may be future changes we could make to accept this code, but I think NLL is meeting our current expectations here. I'm going to tag as NLL-deferred.
(and remove from the RC2 milestone)
hmm reading over I sort of understand :)
this reminds me that I really want to spend more time thinking about our errors, and in particular the way that we talk about drops and destructors
I think that this is "invisible code" it's a place where we should be very careful with our terminology
in conversations with folks, I've been surprised to see how much confusion there is in this general area
makes me realize not everybody studied the MIR RFC :P