I think we should kill the WG-compiler-nll label and just use A-nll. Thoughts?
here is list of issues currently tagged A-nll but not WG-compiler-nll
(I wanted to look at that because I had a vague notion that there had at one point been a subtle distinction between the two labels)
but looking over that list now, I see no reason that we couldn't do what you suggest: retire WG-compiler-nll and just use A-nll.
"less labels == more better" in general, IMO
Can replace it with "double peanut butter doesn't live up to expectations"
done, just A-nll now