Stream: t-compiler/wg-nll

Topic: A-nll vs WG-compiler-nll


nikomatsakis (Aug 27 2018 at 13:29, on Zulip):

I think we should kill the WG-compiler-nll label and just use A-nll. Thoughts?

pnkfelix (Aug 27 2018 at 13:40, on Zulip):

here is list of issues currently tagged A-nll but not WG-compiler-nll

pnkfelix (Aug 27 2018 at 13:41, on Zulip):

(I wanted to look at that because I had a vague notion that there had at one point been a subtle distinction between the two labels)

pnkfelix (Aug 27 2018 at 13:41, on Zulip):

but looking over that list now, I see no reason that we couldn't do what you suggest: retire WG-compiler-nll and just use A-nll.

Jake Goulding (Aug 27 2018 at 14:30, on Zulip):

"less labels == more better" in general, IMO

Jake Goulding (Aug 27 2018 at 14:32, on Zulip):

Can replace it with "double peanut butter doesn't live up to expectations"

nikomatsakis (Aug 27 2018 at 18:42, on Zulip):

done, just A-nll now

Last update: Nov 21 2019 at 14:00UTC