Stream: general

Topic: rust wg-leads mailing list


Santiago Pastorino (Jan 25 2020 at 18:54, on Zulip):

@XAMPPRocky I was talking with @Pietro Albini about the wg-leads mailing list

Santiago Pastorino (Jan 25 2020 at 18:54, on Zulip):

@Pietro Albini says it works and we were checking the code and it seems it does the right thing

Santiago Pastorino (Jan 25 2020 at 18:54, on Zulip):

you told me that it doesn't work?

Santiago Pastorino (Jan 25 2020 at 18:54, on Zulip):

you know what happens exactly?

XAMPPRocky (Jan 25 2020 at 18:55, on Zulip):

@Santiago Pastorino Wrong stream?

XAMPPRocky (Jan 25 2020 at 18:56, on Zulip):

Either way. People haven’t been getting mail about all hands. That was just my guess. There’s definitely something wrong with all

XAMPPRocky (Jan 25 2020 at 18:56, on Zulip):

“Wrong” as in doesn’t match what I would expect.

Santiago Pastorino (Jan 25 2020 at 18:57, on Zulip):

Santiago Pastorino Wrong stream?

well unsure where to place this, could have been in #rust-all-hands-2020 (public)

Santiago Pastorino (Jan 25 2020 at 18:58, on Zulip):

but it's a general issue, unrelated to t-compiler so ... unsure :)

Pietro Albini (Jan 25 2020 at 19:19, on Zulip):

@XAMPPRocky who?

Pietro Albini (Jan 25 2020 at 19:23, on Zulip):

looked at mailgun, I don't see recent bounces either

XAMPPRocky (Jan 25 2020 at 20:02, on Zulip):

@Pietro Albini Anyone who's in a team working group seems to be the one correlation.

Pietro Albini (Jan 25 2020 at 20:03, on Zulip):

oh working groups were explicitly meant not to be in all@

Pietro Albini (Jan 25 2020 at 20:03, on Zulip):

regardless of whether they were team or domain wgs

XAMPPRocky (Jan 25 2020 at 20:06, on Zulip):

Well we need to include the team wg members. As it seems to be everyones expectation, that they are supposed invited in to the all hands. I suspect in the future this is solved by making these project groups and including those in all, and leaving domain wgs as is.

Pietro Albini (Jan 25 2020 at 20:14, on Zulip):

well this was not what I was told when I created all@ with the team repo :sweat_smile:

Pietro Albini (Jan 25 2020 at 20:15, on Zulip):

like, all@ is working as intended, it's just not suitable for all hands invitations

XAMPPRocky (Jan 25 2020 at 20:16, on Zulip):

@Pietro Albini I don't doubt that, I suspect this is a result of working groups and all hands changing from last year.

XAMPPRocky (Jan 25 2020 at 20:17, on Zulip):

I would like to make all@ the single source of truth as it were for contacting rust-lang members.

Pietro Albini (Jan 25 2020 at 20:18, on Zulip):

team members, or just people involved in the project?

XAMPPRocky (Jan 25 2020 at 20:20, on Zulip):

Well in my mind it should mimic the policy of all hands. If you're someone that should be qualified to attend all hands you should be in all.

XAMPPRocky (Jan 25 2020 at 20:22, on Zulip):

Which I believe is teams, sub-teams, and wg-leads.

XAMPPRocky (Jan 25 2020 at 21:43, on Zulip):

@Pietro Albini People who are in team working groups.

XAMPPRocky (Jan 25 2020 at 21:43, on Zulip):

Or at least that’s the one thing that connects them

Last update: Feb 25 2020 at 03:40UTC